On 9/14/11 11:10 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
A fine document. I support its publication.
Of course, you should have changed all references to vCard 4 to vCard 5,
There is no vCard5. The version in RFC 6350 is vCard4.
and reference to VCARDDAV WG draft to RFC 6350.
Naturally. That will be automatically updated by the RFC Editor anyway,
but it doesn't hurt to fix it before then.
Also:
Syntax specifications shown here use the augmented Backus-Naur Form
(ABNF) as described in [RFC5234], and are specified as in the base
vcard specification [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev].
I think the following should be enough:
Syntax specifications shown here use the Augmented Backus-Naur Form
(ABNF) as described in [RFC5234].
I'll leave that up to the authors.
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
14.09.2011 18:44, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the vCard and CardDAV WG (vcarddav)
to consider the following document:
- 'vCard Format Extensions : place of birth, place and date of death'
<draft-ietf-vcarddav-birth-death-extensions-00.txt> as a Proposed
Standard
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf