On 9/24/11 11:24 AM, "Cameron Byrne" <cb(_dot_)list6(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Let's avoid having yet another thread where there is no consensus but the
parties continue to restate their claims over and over.
Fair enough. We're discussing the reservation of a prefix; the context is a
foregone conclusion.
Now, if you are in the business of selling ipv4 address space on the
secondary market, as folks have linked to you before on the nanog list, you
must like the idea of pushing out ipv6 deployment in favor of the broken
nat444 ipv4 ecosystem.... platitudes about ipv6 aside.
Here you claim to be "friends" with ipv4 black-marketeers
http://diswww.mit.edu/charon/nanog/139751
Yes, I'm friends with many people. Some of them vote for the opposite
political party as me, some of them work for my competitors, etc. I may
agree with some friends, disagree with others, and even hold competing ideas
in my mind at the same time. Yet I remain my own person.
-Benson
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf