ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level-05.txt

2011-09-26 17:25:18
Jonathan Lennox wrote:

Hi, Alexey -- thank you for the Gen-ART review.
Hi Jonathan,

Alexey Melnikov writes:
Question: are the two encoding of the audio level indication option specified 
in the document really necessary?

Do you mean the one-byte vs. two-byte forms of the header extension (Figure 1 
vs. Figure 2)?  These are the two forms of the generic header extensions 
defined by RFC 5285.

I understood that. Does RFC 5285 require that both forms should be allowed?
In general, it would be good to avoid multiple representations of the same thing.

The actual payload (one byte containing the V and level bits) is identical in 
the two cases; the only difference is the container.  We can add some text 
clarifying this point if you think it would be helpful.
Nits/editorial comments:
s/relys/relies ???
Thanks, will fix.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf