I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-10
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2011-10-03
IESG Telechat date: 2011-10-06
Summary: This draft may be ready for publication as a draft standard. All of
the substantive comments from my last call review have been addressed either in
the draft or in email. I do have one new concern below, but I am agnostic on
whether that should affect publication.
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
-- Section 7, first paragraph: "During the review of this document, It emerged
that there are different possible interpretations of [RFC5798]. The Authors of
that document and the VRRP working group were unable to reach consensus on
which interpretation is correct."
That's rather unfortunate, since that RFC specifies the protocol this MIB is
_for_. I wish we could do better. From my limited knowledge here, I am agnostic
as to whether the disagreement would make a substantive difference in the MIB.
I put this in the "minor" section in hopes that it does not--but people more
versed in the protocol should think about this.
Nits/editorial comments:
-- definition of "vrrpv3StatisticsRefreshRate"
s/milli-seconds/milliseconds
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf