Malcolm,
I'm technically incompetent to comment on draft-tsb-mpls-tp-ach-ptn.
However, if we reframe the debate as "how to reconcile OaM for
Ethernet-based PTN with OaM for MPLS-TP-based PTN", we might have
a more productive discussion.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-10-07 03:00, Malcolm(_dot_)BETTS(_at_)zte(_dot_)com(_dot_)cn wrote:
Brian,
The second solution already exists, (300,00+ nodes already deployed - see
other emails on this thread). We must acknowledge this and find the most
cost effective way of allowing interconnection. That is best achieved by
recognizing the Ethernet tool set based solution and defining
interconnection such that an interworking function is not required. This
has already been proposed and documented in draft revised Recommendation
G.8110.1 (now in ITU-T last call) and is described in
draft-tsb-mpls-tp-ach-ptn.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf