ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

ITU-T Beijing meeting [Was: Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC]

2011-10-10 04:43:38
Yuxia wrote:

I also agree with Huub. 

As a consensus reached in Beijing meeting, mechanism using the tools defined
for MPLS is a default tool set and another using the tools defined in
G.8013/Y.1731
is an optional one. 

That is a an interesting and helpful statement. Obviously, most IETF
participants were not present at this meeting: is there a possibility that this
message could be communicated to the IETF in a more official way?

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf