Hi,
If we must...
I cannot find section 1.1 or the text "one OAM solution" in the PDF version of
RFC 5317.
I think Loa meant Section 1.1 of draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations and
its reference to RFC 5317 (not Section 1.1 of the RFC itself).
The last paragraph of section 1 states:
In the case of a conflict between the summary and the
slides, the slides take precedence. Since those slides were the
basis of an important agreement between the IETF and the ITU-T, it
should further be noted that in the event that the PDF version of the
slides differs from those emailed to ITU-T and IETF management on 18
April 2008 by the co-chairs of the JWT, the emailed slides take
precedence.
The full quote from slide 12 is:
This presentation is a collection of assumptions, discussion points and
decisions that the combined group has had during the months of March and
April, 2008
This represents the *agreed upon starting point* for the technical
analysis of the T-MPLS requirements from the ITU-T and the MPLS
architecture to meet those requirements
I must also remind you that the JWT did not have the power to make decision
for the ITU or IETF
No, it didn't. It had the power to make recommendations. Those recommendations
were accepted by both the IETF and the ITU-T.
The ITU-T communicated its acceptance of the recommendations in a liaison to the
IETF. This is documented in RFC5317 as:
These JWT recommendations were accepted by ITU-T management
[MPLS-TP1].
Thanks,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf