Roni,
Thanks for the reviewing. The document has been largely rewritten after the
IESG evaluation. We believe we have resolved the discusses.
Best regards,
Sheng
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 10:48 PM
To: draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list'; gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-07
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-07
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2011-10-30
IETF LC End Date: 2011-11-4
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an informational RFC.
Major issues:
I do not have any editorial issues but I am not sure about the value of the
document. I saw the IESG evaluation record
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps/ballot/ and did
not see any value with repeating the comments. So if the discuss are resolved
the draft can be published. This is the reason that I summarized it as almost
ready for publication.
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf