ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: "class E"

2011-12-05 13:25:35
from [Frank Ellermann] [Permanent Link] 
On 5 December 2011 19:00, David Conrad <drc(_at_)virtualized(_dot_)org> wrote:

 [IETF and 240/4]

Does it actually matter?


Dunno, I can't judge it.  But I'd be seriously disappointed if any
hard- or software on my side won't let me participate in any 240/4
"experiments", for all possible definitions of "experiment".

-Frank (found a plausible expansion of "CPE" :-)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: "class E", Frank Ellermann <=
Previous by Date:  Re: "class E" (was: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request), Noel Chiappa
Next by Date:  Re: "class E" (was: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request), Bob Hinden
Previous by Thread:  Re: Consensus Call (Update): draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request, Noel Chiappa
Next by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-storm-rddp-registries-00.txt> (IANA Registries for the RDDP (Remote Direct Data Placement) Protocols) to Proposed Standard, SM
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]