Also taking my chair hat off ... as Malcolm stated that G.8113.1
applies to PWs, and the requested allocation is in a registry that
originated in the PWE3 working group, I agree that a PWE3 WG last call
is warranted. This could certainly take place in parallel with the
MPLS WG last call.
Cheers,
Andy
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Loa Andersson <loa(_at_)pi(_dot_)nu> wrote:
All (taking chair hat off),
I agree with Ross's comments below that if the document is last called
it should go through a wg last call (pwe3 and mpls) and through an IETF
last call.
I agree that these last calls could be in parallel is necessary, but I
believe that running the wg last call first and the IETF last call would
be beneficial. Given that we have a stable document with stable
references to last call.
/Loa
On 2012-01-13 06:43, Ross Callon wrote:
Adrian wrote:
My review of the write-up and discussions...
3. There seems to be quite a feeling on the mailing lists that this
document
should be run through the MPLS working group. The write-up makes a case
for
progressing it as AD sponsored. As far as I can see, the main assertions
to
answer are as follows. Do you have a view on these points before I make a
decision on what to do?
a. This is a proposal to use an MPLS code point and so is part of MPLS by
definition.
b. The type of network being managed by the OAM described in G.8113.1 is
an MPLS
network. Therefore, this is clearly relevant to the MPLS working .
Do you object to this going through the MPLS on principle, or were you
just
hoping to save the WG the work? If the latter, and if the WG wants to
look at
the draft, the easiest approach seems to be to redirect the work to the
working
group.
My personal opinion (speaking as an individual)...
It is pretty clear that there is a lot of interest in this topic in the
MPLS WG. It also is clear that this proposal is very much about MPLS.
Thus draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point needs to be last called in the MPLS
WG.
It seems clear that the document also needs IETF last call. I assume this
means that one last call would be posted to both the MPLS and IETF WG lists.
It seems that this same last call should also be copied to the PWE3 list.
Ross
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
--
Loa Andersson email:
loa(_dot_)andersson(_at_)ericsson(_dot_)com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa(_at_)pi(_dot_)nu
Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13
+46 767 72 92 13
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf