I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-vbr-audio-04
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2012-01-23
IETF LC End Date: 2012-01-23
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard.
Note: I performed a gen-art review on revision 3 of this draft in a previous
last call. My understanding is that the draft has been last called again due to
the change from BCP to PS. I had no substantive concerns in that version, and
see no new substantive concerns in this version.
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
-- The draft status still says BCP
-- section 5, 1st paragraph, 2nd to last sentence: "...but the amount of
padding needed to hide the variation in packet size will depend on the
codec), codec and the sophistication of the attacker),... "
Perhaps we should just assume the attacker is reasonably sophisticated by
current standards? I assume you don't expect an implementer to guess how
sophisticated a potential attack may be in advance--unless that is somehow a
function of the value of the content?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf