On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
World IPv6 Launch changes the relevance of this document greatly, I
think. Since this would be published after the announcement of World
IPv6 Launch, I think the document should be updated to discuss its own
applicability in a post- World IPv6 Launch Internet.
With respect...
The document was originally discussed in v6ops, and you chose to not comment.
It went through last call there in January 2011 and was sent to the IESG. IESG
review took until April, and an updated draft was posted at the end of May
2011. At IETF 81 (Quebec City) we were able to have you, the author, and some
others discuss it. The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that
draft - in large part, a rewrite - arrived in October. v6ops had a second WGLC,
in which you again declined to comment, although you may have seen Lorenzo's
comments, which were picked up in a November version of the draft. Ralph and
Jari finally cleared their "discuss" ballots a couple of weeks ago, and we are
having a second IETF last call.
I'd like to understand your objective here. I know that you don't care for the
draft, and at least at one point took it as a somewhat-personal attack. Is your
objective to prevent the draft's publication entirely, or do you think that
there is value in publishing it given a productive response to this comment? At
what point are you willing to either participate in the public dialog or choose
to not comment at all?
On 2 February 2012 00:09, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to
consider the following document:
- 'Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6'
<draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> as an
Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-02-15. Exceptionally,
comments may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document describes considerations for the transition of end user
content on the Internet to IPv6. While this is tailored to address
end user content, which is typically web-based, many aspects of this
document may be more broadly applicable to the transition to IPv6 of
other applications and services. This document explores the
challenges involved in the transition to IPv6, potential migration
tactics, possible migration phases, and other considerations. The
audience for this document is the Internet community generally,
particularly IPv6 implementers.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf