not replying specific to this mail but to the tons that have arrived
lately, are there some confusion out there that it is the amount of
"votes" on ietf@ that make a do/do not on a draft? ... or just me
missunderstanding this?
anyway, great to see people participate :-)
--- Roger J ---
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Erichsen, Kirk
<kirk(_dot_)erichsen(_at_)twcable(_dot_)com> wrote:
I fully support this draft and would like to see it progress to conclusion
without further delay.
With warm regard,
Kirk Erichsen
Principle Technology Engineer
Time Warner Cable
ATG West
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail
and any printout.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Roger Jorgensen |
rogerj(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no ; | roger(_at_)jorgensen(_dot_)no
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf