On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, The IESG
<iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Congestion Exposure WG (conex)
to consider the following document:
- 'ConEx Concepts and Use Cases'
<draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-04-12. Exceptionally,
comments may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document provides the entry point to the set of documentation
about the Congestion Exposure (ConEx) protocol. It explains the
motivation for including a ConEx marking at the IP layer: to expose
information about congestion to network nodes. Although such
information may have a number of uses, this document focuses on how
the information communicated by the ConEx marking can serve as the
basis for significantly more efficient and effective traffic
management than what exists on the Internet today.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
Didn't Mr Briscoe just email that there was a BT IPR claim against
this ID, related to re-ECN work he did/does for BT?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/current/msg00916.html