At 14:53 16-05-2012, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Managed Incident Lightweight
Exchange WG (mile) to consider the following document:
- 'Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF'
<draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-05-30. Exceptionally, comments
may be
The Abstract mentions that this draft contains a template for
[writing] Internet-Drafts describing [extensions to IODEF]. Why is a
RFC needed for a template to write I-Ds? It seems like the WG is
encouraging future authors to copy and paste the text and generate new RFCs.
Regards,
-sm