As one of the co-authors I take the liberty to reply on your question. That is
a part of the content of the DPS to announce how updates and amendments are
communicated.
Anne-Marie
Sent from my HTC
----- Reply message -----
From: "Russ Housley" <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com>
To: "Peter Yee" <peter(_at_)akayla(_dot_)com>
Cc:
"draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org"
<draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>,
"gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org" <gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>,
"ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08
Date: Sun, Jul 15, 2012 18:39
Peter:
Thanks for the review. I've not read this document yet, but you review raises
a question in my mind.
If a DNSSEC policy or practice statement is revised or amended, what actions
are needed make other aware of the change?
Russ
On Jul 14, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Peter Yee wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review Date: 14-July-2012
IETF LC End Date: 17-July-2012
IESG Telechat date: Pending
Summary: This draft provides a framework for the creation of DNSSEC Policies
and Practice Statements.
Major Issues: None
Minor Issues:
Section 4.4.5 discusses how to handle key compromise. It might be useful to
discuss here or somewhere else in the document how the compromise is
prevented from recurring if there were no attenuating measures in place
beforehand. That might well lead to a revision of the DP or DPS. The draft
doesn't really discuss under what circumstances a document should be
iterated or amended. Of course, that might be considered a meta issue
and outside of the scope of the DP or DPS proper.
Nits/editorial comments:
In Section 4.6, "behaviour" is spelt in the British manner. While
most assuredly not incorrect, you may wish to spell it in the
American manner.
Serial commas are used inconsistently. Nothing as egregious as the
following
example, however. ;-)
http://grammarnowtips.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/a-case-for-the-serial-comma/
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art