Hi all,
I'd like to check that some recent minor changes to this
document [1] don't cause technical or process-grief.
The version [2] of the oauth bearer draft that underwent
IETF LC and IESG evaluation had a normative dependency
on the httpbis wg's authentication framework. [3]
After resolving IESG discuss positions the authors and
wg chairs felt that it would be better to replace the
normative reference to the httpbis wg draft [3] with one
to RFC 2617 [4] so that the OAuth drafts wouldn't be held
in the RFC editor queue waiting on the httpbis wg to get
done.
I believe there is no impact on interop resulting from
this change but there has been some disagreement about
making it and how it was made. After some offlist discussion
I think we now have an RFC editor note [5] that means that
the current scheme of referring to RFC 2617 is ok.
If there are no problems with this in the next week I'll
move the document [1] along as-is.
Thanks,
Stephen.
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-18
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth
[4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2617
[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/writeup/