ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to

2012-08-09 06:01:28
from [John C Klensin] [Permanent Link] 


--On Thursday, August 09, 2012 09:27 +0100 Dave Cridland
<dave(_at_)cridland(_dot_)net> wrote:


Does anyone other than historians honestly care what the
original was? I mean, really?


Dave,

RFCs are often incorporated by reference in procurement
documents and conformity requirements.  If one were trying to
interpret or enforce such a requirement, it would almost
certainly be useful to know _exactly_ what version of an RFC and
its interpretations was agreed to.

   john
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Meetecho session recording for IETF-84 Telepresence (CLUE) Tutorial, Simon Pietro Romano
Next by Date:  Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to, Dave Cridland
Previous by Thread:  Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to, Dave Cridland
Next by Thread:  Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to, Dave Cridland
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]