ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Your comments on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-15.txt

2012-08-24 06:07:55
Hi Adrian,

Yes my comments requested by last call to be submitted to IESG for the
subject (evaluation purpose) have been ended. However, if I get any
request/receive/read any new issue in IETF, I may comment again to IETF
discuss list. For the OLSRv2 in general comments will never end as long as
there are users and as long the internet mission is development/progress,
but to IESG I have ended the comments (one additional to ietf) which I
mentioned the *end* in my last comment to IESG. They were separate to focus
each comment on separate related view.

I don't know how is the practice of IESG process or Last Call process, but
I have tried many times with the authors before, to make the document
better but they think my comments are not important (which maybe they are
right). Therefore, I don't want to give any permission to share with them,
I will leave it to IESG. If IESG agrees to share any/all comments they
received to any/all author(s), I will have no objection.

Thanking you,

Best Regards

Abdussalam Baryun (AB)
University of Glamorgan, UK
++++++++++++++++++++++
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Adrian Farrel 
<adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:

Hi Abdussalam,

Thank you for your review comments on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-15.txt

I see seven separate points raised in separate emails. Can you confirm
that this
is the totality of your comments.

I also note that the seventh email was sent to only the IESG. May I have
your
permission to share this email with the document authors.

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: iesg-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:iesg-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Abdussalam Baryun
Sent: 22 August 2012 23:01
To: iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-15.txt> (The Optimized
Link
State
Routing Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

Reply to your request dated 29/07/2012
Draft Reviewed By: Abdussalam Baryun (AB)   Dated: 22/08/2012

Reviewer Comment AB7: Comments on text in document history [*].
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2/history/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

A key difference between RFC3626 and OLSRv2 is the introduction of
support for link metrics. An individual draft
(draft-dearlove-olsrv2-metrics-00) was submitted in 2007, discussing
the design options, culminating in 2010 with
draft-dearlove-olsrv2-metrics-05 documenting Working Group consensus
on this matter. Metrics support was, then, folded into OLSRv2.

AB> the reviewer thinks the difference is that OLSRv2 is a metric base
router that uses NHDP and RFC5444 packets which are general MANET
interface protocol and general MANET packet format respectively.
OLSRv2 is applicable for more scenarios and routers that are
constraint devices.

This version of OLSRv2 was given a one month WGLC, so as to ensure
sufficient time to review the document.

AB> my comments within the period was not considered by the authors
and don't see any consensus from the WG.

There was an issue concerning the differences between the -14 and -15
revisions of the document, brought up by one WG member. The consensus
opinion from the WG is that the document should proceed, without
additional edits.

AB> yes there was a new version update after my comments and
discussion with the authors, but still not happy with the outcome.

Best Regards
AB
+++++++++++++++++
The end of my comments (the comments were 7 including this, two only
for the IESG and one addition for only IEFT).
========================================================

On 7/29/12, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks WG
(manet) to consider the following document:
- 'The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2'
  <draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-15.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-08-22. Exceptionally, 
comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain 
the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. This last
call
period has been extended to handle the fact that it spans the IETF-84
meeting.

This last call is being re-initiated to include a notice that this
document
includes a normative down reference to an Informational RFC:
RFC5148, "Jitter considerations in MANETs".

Abstract

   This specification describes version 2 of the Optimized Link State
   Routing (OLSRv2) protocol for Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs).

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>