Pete,
Your Section 4 change looks fine to me, thanks.
The "monkey-in-the-middle" terminology is Randy's and I will defer to him.
(I've added him to the To:)
--John
On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Pete McCann <mccap(_at_)petoni(_dot_)org> wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-09
Reviewer: Peter McCann
Review Date: 2012-10-01
IETF LC End Date: 2012-10-01
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
Section 4:
An "affected prefix" is any prefix that
was matched by a deleted or updated mapping, or could be matched by
an added mapping.
SHOULD BE:
An "affected prefix" is any prefix that
was matched by a deleted or updated mapping, or could be matched by
an added or updated mapping.
Nits/editorial comments:
Abstract:
monkey-in-the-middle
That's a game of keep-away. Did you mean man-in-the-middle? Perhaps
this is a technical term that has been discussed on the mailing list.