Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell

ietf

Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]

2013-02-03 10:56:15



On 2/3/2013 8:43 AM, John C Klensin wrote:

All of this could be summarized as "it is better to have one's
ducks lined up before starting a community-wide discussion".



for the IETF, you mean cats shepherded, not ducks lined up...

d/
--
 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], John C Klensin Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], Dave Crocker <=

Previous by Date:	Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], John C Klensin
Next by Date:	Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Sam Hartman
Previous by Thread:	Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC], John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10, Richard Barnes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]