Hi Roni,
Thanks. Will do the edit you pointed out.
Thanks,
Nbail
From: Roni Even
<ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com<mailto:ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:46 AM
To:
"draft-ietf-ancp-pon(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:draft-ietf-ancp-pon(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>"
<draft-ietf-ancp-pon(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:draft-ietf-ancp-pon(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>>
Cc: "ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>"
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>,
"gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>"
<gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org<mailto:gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>>
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04
Resent-To:
<droms(_at_)bucknell(_dot_)edu<mailto:droms(_at_)bucknell(_dot_)edu>>,
<matthew(_dot_)bocci(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com<mailto:matthew(_dot_)bocci(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com>>,
"<,
nabil(_dot_)n(_dot_)bitar(_at_)verizon(_dot_)com<mailto:nabil(_dot_)n(_dot_)bitar(_at_)verizon(_dot_)com>>",
<sanjay(_dot_)wadhwa(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com<mailto:sanjay(_dot_)wadhwa(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com>>,
<wdec(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com<mailto:wdec(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>>
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2013–2–12
IETF LC End Date: 2013-2–19
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
1. OMCI is expanded very late in the document and not on the first usage.