You need at least two more properties
(iii) High technical standard products
(iv) Efficient
All the openness and fairness in the world is no use if it produces bad
products,
or if it produces little or no product, or product so late it's no use.
(That wording is tailored to protocols etc. There are similar properties for an
AD,
just worded slightly differently.)
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 | Fax: +44 1245 242124
chris(_dot_)dearlove(_at_)baesystems(_dot_)com | http://www.baesystems.com
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
Sent: 08 March 2013 12:18
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: The desires of the IETF community
----------------------! WARNING ! ----------------------
This message originates from outside our organisation,
either from an external partner or from the internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters
for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.
--------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
I'll list the properties sought as:
(i) Open
(ii) Fair
There will be sessions at IETF 86 where anyone can say whatever he or
she wishes. That takes care of the first property.
It is not possible to determine what is fair. Each and everyone has
to decide for himself/herself. However, it is unfair for the
individuals on NomCom 2012, the IAB, the IESG and the candidates as
their actions are constrained by rules or practices. What if there
is an environment where the individuals can interact in good faith
while taking BCP 10 into consideration?
NomCom 2012 has to get an understanding of the IETF community's
consensus of the qualifications required. There isn't any rule which
restricts NomCom from having a session at IETF 86 to listen to the
desires of the IETF community. There isn't any rule which restricts
individuals who happen to be on NomCom 2012 from asking clarifying
question. There isn't any rule which restricts individuals who
happen to be on the IAB from asking clarifying questions. There
isn't any rule which restricts individuals who are candidates from
asking clarifying questions.
Once NomCom 2012 has an understanding of the qualifications required
it can talk to any possible candidate, even if the person is not on
the current list. Note that NomCom 2012 does not have to disclose
the qualities which it will consider to select a candidate.
If the NomCom 2012 concludes that there isn't any confirmed candidate
yet it can announce that. After all, it is not a surprise to anyone
to hear that there isn't any confirmed candidate at the
moment. NomCom 2012 can also report the difficulties it encountered
separately.
The TSVAREA session can then be used to discuss about the
difficulties and how IESG operations will be affected.
I attempted to separate two questions, qualifications required and
what to do about the position. As I don't have much time to write
this message I may be missing some points.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************