On 3/16/13 4:54 PM, James Galvin wrote:
<snip>
It seems to me that the real question here is what is the role of the
confirming body? Should its role be biased towards a review (however
deep) of the work of the NOMCOM or should its role be biased towards
ensuring the NOMCOM has followed the process in selecting its slate of
candidates?
Jim
Towards the NOMCOM has followed the correct procedure and there were no
anomalies.
If the confirming body starts rejected candidates because it does not
like them or thinks that they do not have the proper qualifications,
then we have a problem with our procedures.
/as