ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

2013-04-07 06:23:25
All April 1 RFCs should not be categorised historical but 
Category: CLASSIFIED TOP SECRET EYES ONLY NEED TO KNOW SIPRNET COBRA VATICAN 
FNORD KNITTING PATTERN
Distribution: Unlimited.

We should also start a December 25 series. With something on SOCKS.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
Behalf Of Elwyn Davies [elwynd(_at_)dial(_dot_)pipex(_dot_)com]
Sent: 06 April 2013 21:26
To: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
Cc: ietf; Abdussalam Baryun
Subject: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April    
the     first

Right.. they are mind expanding drugs.  Essential for keeping us sane.

/Elwyn

Sent from my ASUS Pad

"Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:



Sent from my iPad

On 6 Apr 2013, at 14:04, "Abdussalam Baryun" 
<abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:


If the date is
special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.


Surely the correct requirement is :

If the date is special then those RFCs MUST be *hysterical*.

- Stewart





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>