Re: Purpose of IESG Review

On Apr 15, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Michael Richardson 
<mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> wrote:

Maybe we should have an IETF first call (for objections), rather than
last call.


I think that would look a lot like a DoS attack on the IETF, but it would be 
nice if there were a way to make it work.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Purpose of IESG Review, (continued) Re: Purpose of IESG Review, John Leslie Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Jari Arkko Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Andy Bierman Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Fred Baker (fred) Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Elwyn Davies Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Michael Richardson Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Ted Lemon <= Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Stephen Farrell Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Dave Crocker Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Fred Baker (fred) Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Stewart Bryant Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Martin Rex Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Brian E Carpenter Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Martin Rex

Previous by Date:	Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch
Next by Date:	Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Stephen Farrell
Previous by Thread:	Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Michael Richardson
Next by Thread:	Re: Purpose of IESG Review, Joe Touch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]