---- Original Message -----
From: "Clint Chaplin" <clint(_dot_)chaplin(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
To: "IETF Discussion List" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: <netmod(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:39 PM
Why did this (and the other most recent) last call also not go to
IETF-Announce?
And I was wondering why I got four copies of it, three on April 20th,
one on April 22nd. Partly it is having a different address for
ietf-announce as opposed to that for netmod, but it is also because they
come from both 'The IESG' and from the 'IETF Secretary', both to my
ietf-announce address (but none to my ietf-discuss address).
I think that the underlying issue is communication, that changes to a
system that affect how people work are best communicated in advance,
even when the benefits of a change are overwhelmingly beneficial to all
concerned:-)
Tom Petch
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:24 AM, The IESG <noreply(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling
Language
WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
- 'A YANG Data Model for IP Management'
<draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to
the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-05-03. Exceptionally,
comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for management of IP
implementations.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
--
Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
Principal Engineer
Standards & Technology Enabling
Advanced Technology Lab
Samsung R&D Institute America - Silicon Valley