On Apr 26, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Yaron Sheffer
<yaronf(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
- There should be long-term commitment to maintain the data. I think we
simply don't have such processes in place, and personally I don't want to
even try to deal with this problem. I suspect that we'd have to eventually
use paid help if we are serious about keeping the information current, and I
don't even think it would be worth the cost.
Understood. That said, we already have working group wikis and errata. I don't
want to trivialize the investment, but it seems like we have at least part of
the infrastructure already. I'm asking what will be the best for IETF
discussion and for maintenance of the information. I suspect it's something we
can do if we choose to.