On 4/28/13, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thank you for your thorough review. While I accept many of your
comments, I must say I disagree with you on a few points, which together
go to the core of our motivation in writing this document. Thank you for
helping me clarify these points to myself :-)
- Our goal is much *less* ambitious than defining a framework for
documenting implementations for long-term protocol projects. Our primary
goal is to aid working group members in making informed decisions about
the quality of specifications. I believe this narrow focus is much more
realistic.
Was this goal/point mentioned in the I-D if not, it will be nice to
clarify this point to future readers,
- As a result of the above: 1. We define the information as pre-RFC
only; 2. The main medium is the I-D, as opposed to Web pages/wikis/CMS
(although we see them as valid alternatives); 3. We focus on WG
documents, as opposed to "all" IETF documents.
If not mentioned in I-D, please clarify this point in the I-D,