I received an IESG message asking my comments so I gave it, regard to
your comments below, the reply is that I refer to missing information
needed in the I-D, so the reveiw suggests that there is something
missing. Did not suggested text because I know that it most probably
not be considered.
The Last call ends by 06.06.2013 so I still am in this date, not sure
why you close,
AB
On 6/6/13, Adrian Farrel <adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
I find it somewhat disruptive that this email raises new questions on a
draft
authored in a working group in which you participate, and that it has
arrived
after the end of IETF last call.
I see a series of questions in this message, but no suggested textual
changes. I
therefore conclude that you are requesting no changes and none shall be
made.
Thank you.
Adrian
Reply to your request dated 24/05/2013
I-D: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03
Draft Reviewed By: Abdussalam Baryun (AB) Dated:06/06/2013
Reviewer Comment A3: Use Cases not considered and the Information Bases
Threats.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
*Use-cases threats*