At 07:45 10-06-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Public-Key Infrastructure
(X.509) WG (pkix) to consider the following document:
- 'Enrollment over Secure Transport'
<draft-ietf-pkix-est-07.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-06-24. Exceptionally, comments
may be
There weren't any comments during the WGLC of
draft-ietf-pkix-est-06. The AD review of draft-ietf-pkix-est-06 was
posted to the mailing list and the only comments after that was "this
version address my concerns".
I read the document. It is about the use of an obsolete Proposed
Standard or later versions of that specification. The comments from
three individuals who happen to be Area Directors creates a
conundrum; should I give more weight to them or to a content-free
comment? I do not support the publication of this document as a
Proposed Standard as it is doubtful that it has the consensus of the
working group.
Regards,
-sm