is there a reason to not disclose who the individual participant is?
Scott
On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make
the following status changes:
- RFC2050 from Best Current Practice to Historic
The supporting document for this request can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-2050-to-historic/
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-08-07. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The affected document can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2050/
IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-2050-to-historic/ballot/