On Oct 3, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org>
wrote:
To both Doug and Hector, and others who want to drift in this direction:
As I've said before, the question of moving ADSP to Historic is one
we're taking on its own, and is not connected to anything we do or
don't do with DMARC. Bringing DMARC into the discussion is a
distraction, and, worse, makes it look like there's a tie-in. There
is not.
Dear Berry,
Even John Levine the author had opine along these same lines. The response to
Hector was agreeing a reason should be given, along with agreeing with his
justifications. The tie-in may be limited, but nevertheless DMARC has become
the chosen alternative. It seems if any reasons are given for moving ADSP to
historic it also should conjecture why DMARC and not ADSP, unless your point is
nothing has been learned?
Regards,
Douglas Otis