On Wednesday, November 27, 2013, SM wrote:
In very simplistic terms the draft says:
"consensus to design protocols so as to mitigate the attack, where
possible."
What do our protocol designers think about that mitigation possibility and
about that protocol attack consideration?
Why the draft wants to recommend in a same/one design consideration of such
attack? We may have more design considerations of our protocols.
Does the draft explain "Mitigate the attack" in user favours? users will
think every thing is possible.
What does "where possible" mean here? Is it clear for readers or it is just
me?
The draft written as information and thoughts, so it should be
informational not BCP. If BCP it need to be more specific in making
technical mitigations and their possibilities clear.
AB