Hi Jari, Roni,
Thank you very much for the comments. Is it OK for you to change as below:
Section 3.1, "If the peer has not advertised the corresponding capability, then
label messages using the HSMP FEC Element SHOULD NOT (as described in [RFC6388]
section 2.1) be sent to the peer."
It is better to have the same description with RFC6388 here, so as to avoid any
confusion.
Regards
Lizhong
-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:40 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: 'Lizhong Jin';
draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-
04
Roni, Lizhong,
Thank you very much Roni for your review. And Lizhong for the updates.
(By the way, I saw no change regarding 3.1; I do agree with Roni that
adding some explanation might be useful. This is just a comment,
however - I will let you decide how to deal with it.)
Jari