In any case, as Adrian points out, this document provides no tools for a
misbehaving person to use as an argument.
which clearly says 'not BCP, this is informational' to me.
Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: ietf [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
[jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net]
Sent: 07 January 2014 18:44
To: adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Last call debate on draft-farrell-perpass-attack
Thanks, Adrian - this matches pretty closely my own thoughts as well, but you
put it in very clear words.
And to be honest - we do see over-eager ADs at times (as we sometimes also see
over-eager authors, chairs, or working groups…) and I've been over-eager myself
at times. Hopefully less often nowadays with more perspective. We all make
mistakes. But I've yet to witness a situation where reasonable discussion could
not resolve the situation, not to mention the availability of appeals, nomcom
comments, recalls, etc. In any case, as Adrian points out, this document
provides no tools for a misbehaving person to use as an argument.
Jari