Re: [lisp] [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG

> Zero UDP checksums are being selected for convenience, without an appreciation
> of the overall effects and  costs on other traffic. I see this is occurring 
> in both tsvwg
> and lisp, and it's probably happening elsewhere:
For the LISP working group, or at least for this author, Zero UDP checksums 
were selected out of practicality, performance practicality.

Dino