+100
the same problem would exist with or without the additional encapsulation
(this includes any L2 encaps that may exist in the case of L2 tunelling.)
The only difference is /reach/. This same concern exists *most* common
tunnels types in the internet today.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Joel M. Halpern
<jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com>wrote:
Isn't that basically the problem of the inner traffic sender, not the
problem of the tunnel that is carrying the traffic?
Asking tunnel's to solve the problem of applications with undesirable
behavior seems backwards.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/14/14 10:20 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
On 2014-1-14, at 15:20, Stewart Bryant <stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Yes, the inner (real) transport header is the only meaningful place
to apply congestion avoidance.
But what if the inner traffic isn't congestion controlled?
Lars
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls