ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-04.txt> (Encapsulating MPLS in UDP) to Proposed Standard

2014-01-27 11:17:08

Sorry, are you talking the same h/w that does IP c/s?

That h/w can only see the IP header.

S


On 27/01/2014 16:48, Joe Touch wrote:
Those same mechanisms have provided hardware checksum support for a very long 
time.

Joe

On Jan 27, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

On 24/01/2014 19:15, Joe Touch wrote:

This eliminates the "expands the reach of MPLS argument".

First UDP checksums:

   The UDP checksum is at the beginning of the payload.  Please see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/current/msg11279.html
   This makes filling in a new UDP checksum infeasible on most high end
   hardware.
That argument would make sense if most hardware wasn't store-and-forward on a 
per-packet basis.
They may be store and forward, but most of the high end designs
use multiple grades of memory putting the packet in "slow memory"
and providing a snapshot of the header in "fast memory" to the
forwarder. Thus although the whole packet is in the system, it
it is not accessible to the engine that would need to calculate the
c/s.

Stewart
.



--
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>