On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <
matthew(_dot_)kaufman(_at_)skype(_dot_)net> wrote:
If the same level of urgency were shown towards a viable, and secure,
replacement for TCP itself, then the calls for secure-only access to IETF
services might make sense. Instead, it feels a lot like requiring stronger
deadbolts on glass doors.
FYI http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/ppm-legacy-review/ticket/9