On Apr 17, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Dave Cridland <dave(_at_)cridland(_dot_)net> wrote:
Instead of Experimental, maybe a state before the standards-track proper,
called "Proposed Standard", might work, beyond which you'd need two
interoperable implementations to demonstrate utility and functionality.
I appreciate it's a radical suggestion.
That’s not radical. Radical would be getting to this “proposed standard” of
which you speak in a few months rather than a few years, and without achieving
perfection or even Pete’s definition of rough consensus.
Yoav