Hi Randy,
Sorry, this was my fault. I have a question into the secretariat to see if
I can fix this as it was part of the ballot text. I was checking on the
number of implementations and forgot to go back and update with the answer,
none.
If I can add text, it will note that the working group reached consensus
and that there are no implementations yet. That would be followed with the
text from the shepherd report:
The WG discussion of the document was fairly good, with about average
participation (which
for the IPsecME WG means "the chairs had to beg a bit for more
participants, but we then got
them"). We also got a "TSVDIR-ish review" of the draft, which got good
discussion on the
list. There was a reasonable amount of give-and-take, and the WG Last Call
was uncontentious.
A significant point was brought up during IETF Last Call, and was added to
the Security
Considerations.
Best regards,
Kathleen
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Randy Presuhn
<randy_presuhn(_at_)mindspring(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Hi -
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Sep 2, 2014 3:04 PM
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: ipsecme mailing list <ipsec(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>, ipsecme chair <
ipsecme-chairs(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>, RFC Editor
<rfc-editor(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'IKEv2 Fragmentation' to Proposed Standard
(draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-10.txt)
...
Document Quality
Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a
significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that
merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If
there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type
Review, on what date was the request posted?
It would have been nice if the announcement had included
answers to these questions.
Randy
--
Best regards,
Kathleen