Dean,
See in-line.
Benoit,
You describe the situation really well, but as next step we have to
get more organized and more coordination in modeling work. We have to
make sure that there is not too much overlap between efforts, not too
waste resources
... and inconsistencies between data models, which is my primary concern.
Let's take one example: policies. I see policies in many YANG models.
How do we make sure the policie definitions are consistent and
extensible? How can we coordinate this (huge) effort? Who is in charge?
The collective responsibility might not be enough...
and as well create an architecture description document, where the
relationship between models will be described. With that we can see
which models can be reused as base model in other models.
Good example of coordination is the rtg-coord-yang mailing list, but
we need one for all IETF, to be able to find what are other the teams
working on.
Right.
Regards, Benoit
We should not let this momentum go away and with few simple steps
(like improving coordination and system meta architecture), continue
to feed positive energy into this situation.
Dean
On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
<mailto:bclaise(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>> wrote:
Dear all,
[netmod WG list is bcc'ed]
Enjoy
http://www.ietf.org/blog/2014/11/yang-really-takes-off-in-the-industry/
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <mailto:netmod(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod