ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV

2014-12-06 16:45:34
from [Phillip Hallam-Baker] [Permanent Link] 
Neither. DPRIV is specifying a new transport that can authenticate directly. 
SIG would only get in the way 

Sent from my difference engine



On Dec 6, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Ted Lemon 
<Ted(_dot_)Lemon(_at_)nominum(_dot_)com> wrote:


On Dec 6, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker 
<phill(_at_)hallambaker(_dot_)com> wrote:
* DPRIV be required to provide a mechanism for mutual authentication as well 
as confidentiality.


You mean TSIG?   Or SIG(0)?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV, Randy Bush
Next by Date:  Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09), l.wood
Previous by Thread:  Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV, Ted Lemon
Next by Thread:  Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV, Michael Richardson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]