John Leslie <john(_at_)jlc(_dot_)net> wrote:
> (Nonetheless, I support the IESG choosing to experiment with three
> RTG ADs for one year.)
I hadn't thought yet as to the term and rotation by which the 3 RTG ADs would
get re-evaluated. RFC3777 (and bis) say that the terms shall be such that
"half the IESG" gets evaluated each year.
(If the writeup explained that, I missed it)
As such, it would likely be best if the new RTG AD was a either 1 year or 3
year term simply so that it's opposite the IETF Chair term. However, any
additional flipping around due to the new area would change that anyway.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature