Hi,
This version addresses the concerns from my GEN-ART review. I agree that it's
reasonable to skip the figure numbers with only two small figures.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Jan 9, 2015, at 5:33 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
<acmorton(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:
Ben, Dan, Greg,
Version 09 of -ippm-rate-problem draft addresses your comments
to great extent.
Although Ben's (GEN-ART) suggestion to clarify the figure in the Intro was
adopted, it seems reasonable to leave out the Figure numbers
since the two figures are referenced one time each and they are
only 3 lines high (so not likely to move far, if at all).
Dan's (OPS-DIR) comments have been addressed (following e-mail
exchange) by inserting a new section on Operational Considerations
where we have compromised on the text.
Greg's comments have been addressed to the extent possible without
re-visiting the "Toronto compromise" which only involved section 5.
Other comments cite WG agreements that have not actually been
discussed AFAIK, or refer to purely OPTIONAL features in the memo.
regards,
Al
________________________________________
From: IETF-Announce [ietf-announce-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
The IESG [iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 9:43 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: ippm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> (Rate Measurement
Test Protocol Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm)
to consider the following document:
- 'Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement'
<draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2014-12-22. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This memo presents an access rate-measurement problem statement for
test protocols to measure IP Performance Metrics. The rate
measurement scenario has wide-spread attention of Internet access
subscribers and seemingly all industry players, including regulators.
Key test protocol aspects require the ability to control packet size
on the tested path and enable asymmetrical packet size testing in a
controller-responder architecture.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.