Thank you for the (re)review, Robert.
FWIW, I have also reviewed this specification and believe that its
recommendations are correct and appropriate, within the limits of my expertise.
I have placed a “yes” position for this document on today’s IESG telechat.
Jari
On 13 Feb 2015, at 06:37, Robert Sparks <rjsparks(_at_)nostrum(_dot_)com> wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-09
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 12 Feb 2015
IETF LC End Date: past
IESG Telechat date: 19 Feb 2015
Summary: Ready for publication as BCP
All of the points from my LC review of -08 have been well addressed.
Thanks again for producing such an exceptionally clear document.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail