I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2015-4-27
IETF LC End Date: 2015-5-13
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Standard Track RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
Some questions about the terminology in section 3
1. Client - is this different from RFC6940, if not why repeat?
2. Router - this is a different name for a peer? I also noticed that it
is used once in the document (defining constrained node) where it does not
provide any value
3. Proxy and Proxy node - Why do you need both terms. In section 7 it
uses proxy(PN) like it is the same term.
4. Constrained node the last sentence "In the latter case the node is
often connected to a continuous energy power supply" it is not clear what
is the latter case, also what type of node is meant. Note that there is a
redundant "either a" in the previous sentence.