Adrian, all
Thanks, pleasee see inline
El 05/08/2015 a las 15:02, Adrian Farrel escribió:
Right, thanks Fatai. You have put us right.
But David and I both got confused by Figure 3, and perhaps by the
difference between n and m.
I suggest
OLD
Slot width = 25 GHzSlot width = 37.5 GHz
NEW
Slot width = 25 GHzSlot width = 37.5 GHz
n = 4,m = 2n = 6,m = 3
END
Ramon> ok to change, but don't you mean
NEW
Slot width = 25 GHzSlot width = 37.5 GHz
n = 0,m = 2n = 7,m = 3
OLD
*The '--' represents the nominal central frequency granularity
NEW
*The '--' represents the nominal central frequency granularity in
units of 6.25 GHz
END
Ramon> changed as your suggestion (although I could even argue that it
is not even necessary to explain '--' it can be seen as the frequency
axis and by definition the separation between adjacent 'n' is 6.25 GHz....)
Thanks
Ramon