ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Response to Jari's blog

2015-12-30 14:26:49
Hi!

Thank you Jari, for a great summary of 2015. 

One thing I’m missing is a continued focus on IPv6. I think there has to be 
some pressure and ways to handle IPv6 bugs in current RFCs outside of the 
normal process.

We have submitted several drafts to the dispatch and sipcore working groups, 
all died because of a lack of interest and discussion in the group. The bugs we 
found in the SIP protocol still remains and needs to be fixed in order for SIP 
implementations to handle dual stacks properly - but I can’t find a way to get 
this published following the normal process.

So we have bugs related to IPv6, we have a group of authors and the documents 
still are not going anywhere because a lack of interest.

I know that we have several bugs related to TLS handling in the SIP protocol as 
well. The handling of IPv6 issues doesn’t make me very positive about even 
bothering with writing any drafts about them.

Yes, I am pessimistic. Yes, I am pretty sure there are other protocols that 
have bugs related to both IPv6 and TLS handling. I think the IETF needs to find 
a way to handle these even in low-energy working groups like the SIPcore group.

Happy New Year!

/O


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>